|
|
|
|
|
Interventional treatment of endovascular thrombolysis combined with mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke clinical effect and the impact of immune cell |
Zhu Shen-hui, Li Jun |
Department of Emergency, Changsha first Hospital, Changsha 410005, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of interventional treatment of intravascular thrombolysis combined with mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and its effect on immune cells. Methods Eighty-four cases of acute ischemic stroke patients who were hospitalized in December-2017 January 2017 were prospectively studied. According to different treatment methods, 42 cases were divided into control group and 42 cases in observation group. The control group was treated with interventional intravascular thrombolysis, the observation group combined with mechanical thrombectomy, both groups were followed up for 3 months continuously, and the treatment effect was evaluated. The neurological deficits of both groups were evaluated by National Institute of Health Neurological Deficiency Inventory (NIHSS). The levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+and CD4+/CD8+immune cells in the two groups before and after treatment were measured by FACSCalbur flow cytometry. The levels of TIMI blood flow≥2, the residual stenosis rate, 24 h symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, acute reocclusion and mortality after 3 months were recorded and statistically analyzed. The clinical curative effect and immune cell level influences. Results The intervention group treated with endovascular thrombolysis combined with mechanical thrombectomy 3 months, the effective rate was 92.86%, higher than the control group 73.18% (P<0.05). The scores of NIHSS in observation group were lower than those of control group Group(6.24±1.21 vs. 8.41±1.36, P<0.05). The levels of CD3+, CD4+and CD4+/CD8+in the observation group at 3 months after treatment were higher(64.63±4.69,46.86±4.06,2.26±0.42) than those in the control group(55.62±3.81,36.74±3.57, 1.49±0.29) (P<0.05). The levels of CD8+in the observation group at 3 months after treatment were lower than those in the control group (20.77±3.12 vs. 24.61±3.43,P<0.05). The TIMI blood flow≥2 (59.52% vs. 95.24%)level and acute reocclusion of blood(16.67% vs. 7.14%) in the observation group at 3 months after treatment were lower than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The interventional treatment of intravascular thrombolysis combined with mechanical embolectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke help to improve clinical efficacy, reduce neurological deficits, improve immune cell level. It improves the prognosis of patients, it is of great worth to promote the application.
|
|
About author:: Zhu Shen-hui, E-mail:yongyuan4563@163.com |
|
|
|
[1]徐瑞,殷世武,王转,等.支架取栓与动脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中比较[J].介入放射学杂志, 2016, 25(12):1027-1030.
[2]Coutinho JM, Liebeskind DS, Slater LA, et al. Combined Intravenous Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy vs Thrombectomy Alone for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the SWIFT and STAR Studies[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2017, 74(3): 268.
[3]张萍,张永巍,吴涛,等.静脉溶栓联合血管内治疗对急性中重症脑梗死患者预后的影响因素分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2016, 13(7):343-347.
[4]Lockau H, Liebig T, Henning T, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in tandem occlusion: procedural considerations and clinical results[J]. Neuroradiology, 2015, 57(6):589-598.
[5]黎宏庄,游文霞,李国兴.Solitaire-(TM)AB取栓与尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗急性颅内大动脉闭塞的效果比较[J].广东医学, 2016, 37(7):1060-1063.
[6]Elgendy IY,Kumbhani DJ,Mahmoud A,et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute?Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials[J]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015, 66(22):2498.
[7]许岗勤,王子亮,汪勇锋,等.导丝留置技术在急性脑动脉闭塞机械取栓中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志, 2017, 26(3):202-205.
[8]张杰,买买提力·艾沙,卡合尔曼·卡德尔,等.Solitaire支架机械取栓治疗急性缺血性卒中疗效分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2017, 43(9):549-553.
[9]Takagi T, Yoshimura S, Uchida K, et al. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator before endovascular treatment increases symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery second division: subanalysis of the RESCUE-〖JP〗Japan Registry[J]. Neuroradiology, 2016, 58(2):147-153.
[10]徐如祥,张振海.急性缺血性脑血管病的血管内治疗现状与发展[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2016, 15(11):1081-1083.
[11]Achit H, Soudant M, Hosseini K, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The THRACE Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(10):2843.
[12]刘迪,陈洁,赵宇,等.机械性血管再通治疗超时间窗急性缺血性脑卒中患者11例[J].介入放射学杂志, 2016, 25(4):287-292.
[13]中国卒中学会重症脑血管病分会专家撰写组.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗术后监护与管理中国专家共识[J].中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(3):162-172.
[14]Hentschel KA, Daou B, Chalouhi N, et al. Comparison of non-stent retriever and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy devices for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 126(4):1123.
[15]刘丽萍.《急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗术后监护与管理中国专家共识》解读[J].中华医学杂志, 2017,97(3):161-161.
[16]汪晶,高天,白志峰,等.TREVO取栓支架在缺血性卒中急性期患者中的初步应用[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2017, 14(3):139-144.
[17]Atchaneeyasakul K, Lesliemazwi T, Donahue K, et al. White Matter Hyperintensity Volume and Outcome of Mechanical Thrombectomy With Stentriever in Acute Ischemic Stroke[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(10):2892-2894.
[18]李桂林,杜世伟,李静伟,等.静脉溶栓桥接动脉内取栓治疗颅内大血管急性闭塞的效果分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2017, 14(3):122-126.
[19]Yilmaz U, Krner H, Mühlbenninghaus R, et al. Acute Occlusions of Dual-Layer Carotid Stents After Endovascular Emergency Treatment of Tandem Lesions[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(8):2171-2175.
[20]高培龙,孙世中,孙洪涛,等.静脉溶栓桥接血管介入治疗急性颅内大动脉闭塞的临床疗效观察:附7例报告[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2017, 24(2):151-154.
[21]Shi ZS, Duckwiler GR, Jahan R, et al. New Cerebral Microbleeds After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel Occlusion Strokes[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(47):e2180.
[22]何子骏,罗永春,张振海,等.SolitaireAB支架机械取栓治疗后循环急性缺血性卒中[J].中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(5):340-345.
[23]Renú A, Laredo C, Lopez-Rueda A, et al. Vessel Wall Enhancement and Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier Disruption After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(3):651-657.
[24]高宗恩,陈晓辉,陈健,等.以机械取栓为主的动脉内多模式方法治疗急性大动脉闭塞性脑梗死的效果分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2017, 14(2):71-76.
[25]Gerschenfeld G, Muresan IP, Blanc R, et al. Two Paradigms for Endovascular Thrombectomy After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2017, 74(5):549-556.
[26]樊宇,李月春,王宝军,等.毛细血管指数评分预测急性前循环缺血性卒中血管内治疗预后的价值[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2017,14(2):77-81.
[27]Daubail B, Ricolfi F, Thouant P, et al. Impact of Mechanical Thrombectomy on the Organization of the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke.[J]. Eur Neurol, 2016, 75(1-2):41-47.
[28]傅晓,赵西耀,王力,等.持续质量改进在缩短行静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者入院至给予静脉溶栓治疗时间中的临床价值[J].中国全科医学, 2017, 20(24):2972-2977.
[29]Son S, Kang DH, Hwang YH, et al. Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcome of modern mechanical thrombectomy in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Acta Neurochir(Wien), 2017, 159(9):1663-1669.
[30]Mueller-Kronast NH, Zaidat OO, Froehler MT, et al. Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Primary Results of the STRATIS Registry[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(10):2760-2768. |
|
|
|